Situational Example of Simulated Contract

The effect of an absolutely sham contract was illustrated in Rebusquillo and Orosco v. Spouses Gualvez et al. (G.R. No. 204029, June 4, 2014), where the Supreme Court, through the Honourable former Associate Justice Presbitero Velasco Jr., stated: The alleged deed of sale is simulated and void. This is in accordance with the following provisions of the new Civil Code of the Philippines: In a company whose simulation was absolute, this leads to total or radical disability. This is confirmed, inter alia, by Supreme Court judgment No 236/2008 of 18 March, which follows that case-law. The SC determines that these simulated transactions create an irretrievable nullity. As a result, they will not have the desired effects and the legal situation remains intact. So this was before the birth of the contract with absolute simulation, i.s.as it never existed.

From the above, we can confirm: In order for a transaction to be simulated, both parties must agree to perform such a simulation. If even one of them knew such a simulation, we would talk about the so-called mental reserve. We know that the tax authorities can declare a transaction null and void by considering it simulated. However, does this statement cover all purposes? Is it also considered null and void in civil or commercial transactions? If you apply the above decision in your situation, the alleged deed of purchase signed by your parents is an absolutely sham sale, considering that they did not intend to transfer ownership of their land to your sister when they signed the said documents. The documents should be intended for the processing of the building permit. The sale of the property was not their wish when they signed the documents, so the contract is void. In addition, there is no valid contract between your parents and sister, since two of the essential conditions of a contract under Article 1318 of the new Civil Code are not met, namely: the consent of the contracting parties and the reason for the obligation. Simulation in contracts is not regulated in our Civil Code. Its interpretation has always been based on doctrinal and jurisprudential guidelines. So when do we envisage a deal being simulated? Due to its irremediable condition, the exercise of this act is never limited in time.

This is remarkable because Article 1301 of the Civil Code provides for a limitation period of 4 years for nullity actions. However, the case-law is uniform as regards the fact that this article refers to invalidity. Therefore, when it comes to a contract or a legal transaction whose simulation is absolute, we must take into account the fact that the action for annulment of it does not expire in any way. Simulated contracts must be declared null and void, regardless of their relative or absolute simulated character. The difference is that in the relative simulation, the simulated company is always valid. With the exception, as we have seen, of the donation of hidden real estate. Contract simulation is the act of deliberately deceiving others by falsifying or simulating by agreement the appearance of a contract that does not exist or is hidden. The Supreme Court itself recognizes the validity and effectiveness of the obfuscated transaction, not the simulated transaction. That is, in the example of the sale that was covered as a gift, it would be the gift that would have legal validity. Therefore, the simulated contract disappears and is not valid, and only the simulated contract remains in force. All this provided that the aforementioned disguised contract has been legally concluded and meets the necessary requirements.

However, it is important to clarify that the simulated contract cannot replace or support the simulated contract in its shortcomings. In this context, the previous example of obscured gift was mentioned in doctrinal discussions, which we will analyze later. Reason for the nullity of absolutely simulated contracts – lack of genuine consent and disadvantage them for a third party and is usually fraudulent “In absolute simulation, there is a colorful contract, but it has no substance, because the parties have no intention of being bound by it. The main characteristic of an absolute simulation is that the apparent contract is not really intended or intended to produce legal effects or to change in any way the legal situation of the parties. As a result, an absolutely sham or fictitious contract is void and the parties can claim from each other what they have given under the contract. However, if the parties give an incorrect reason in the contract to conceal their actual agreement, the contract becomes relatively sham and the parties are still bound by their actual agreement. Thus, if the essential requirements of a contract are fulfilled and the simulation relates only to the content or terms of the contract, the agreement between the parties and their successors in title is absolutely binding and enforceable. (emphasis added)¬†Concept of simulation – the simulation of a contract is the deliberate act of entering into a fictitious agreement by the parties for the purpose of deception, when in fact the legal act that appears on the contract does not actually exist or is different from what is actually agreed. The simulation takes place when the parties do not really want the contract they are entering into to have the legal effect expressed in its wording. 2. Relative simulation or if the contract concluded by the parties deviates from their true agreement or if the parties give an incorrect reason in the contract to hide their actual agreement.

The parties are bound by their effective agreement, provided that it does not prejudice a third party and is not intended for a purpose contrary to law, morality, custom, public order or public order. The Central Economic and Administrative Court answered those questions by order of 19 December 2019. This case originated in a decision of the Regional Economic Administrative Court annulling a contract of sale. The Central Economic Administrative Court ruled on the appeal of the regional decision. For example, the main safety risks of a professional scaffolding company work on different types of simulated contracts. As I said, the will of the parties involved is different from that exercised before third parties.

Open chat
Need Help?
Hi there!

Welcome to OMNI-Tech website. Ask us anything, we replay immediately.